Hi,
How can I obtain the client Ip if my SMPP Servers runs under the proxy?
_client.RemoteEndPoint is obtaining the proxy IP.
Search found 15 matches
- Thu Apr 13, 2023 6:45 am
- Forum: Inetlab.SMPP v2.x (.NET Standard, .NET Core)
- Topic: Obtain the client IP over the proxy
- Replies: 3
- Views: 66697
- Thu Dec 30, 2021 12:33 am
- Forum: Inetlab.SMPP v2.x (.NET Standard, .NET Core)
- Topic: Refresh the connectivity
- Replies: 7
- Views: 103321
Re: Refresh the connectivity
I have retested the current version of lib and it works for me now.
Thank you for your support.
Thank you for your support.
- Wed Dec 29, 2021 12:53 am
- Forum: Inetlab.SMPP v2.x (.NET Standard, .NET Core)
- Topic: Refresh the connectivity
- Replies: 7
- Views: 103321
Re: Refresh the connectivity
I am using version 2.8.0.
- Tue Dec 28, 2021 1:14 am
- Forum: Inetlab.SMPP v2.x (.NET Standard, .NET Core)
- Topic: Refresh the connectivity
- Replies: 7
- Views: 103321
Re: Refresh the connectivity
Hi, I used the local IP to check whether the client is connected or not. The situation is our SMSC provider made a migration to a new IP/Port. It will be no issue if I restart my application pool in IIS but the manual reconnect to the new host was failed. After I made a reconnect action. The functio...
- Fri Dec 24, 2021 7:12 am
- Forum: Inetlab.SMPP v2.x (.NET Standard, .NET Core)
- Topic: Refresh the connectivity
- Replies: 7
- Views: 103321
Re: Refresh the connectivity
Updated: After I made several tests, I got this problem as the following logs. Once the bindings were all up, I performed the disconnectAsync action, then reconnect by creating the new connection instances but it's throw this error. At the SMPP server end, the event client connect was fired and the ...
- Tue Dec 21, 2021 9:46 am
- Forum: Inetlab.SMPP v2.x (.NET Standard, .NET Core)
- Topic: Refresh the connectivity
- Replies: 7
- Views: 103321
Refresh the connectivity
Hi, I have observed the problem of the refresh the SMPP connection from us and our provider SMSC. Once our provider SMSC migrates their SMPP server to another host, they ask us to migrate the same. I do some steps Unbind -> Disconnect from the current SMSC and call the _client.Dispose() method. Once...
- Tue Oct 12, 2021 2:43 am
- Forum: Inetlab.SMPP v2.x (.NET Standard, .NET Core)
- Topic: Concatenated in SMPP Server Load Balancing with multiple binds.
- Replies: 2
- Views: 51969
Re: Concatenated in SMPP Server Load Balancing with multiple binds.
I have pushed to the Redis storage for each part, but it needs to define what is the last segment of the messages. Composer is not a good idea in this case. I have run testS with my manual to check the last segment as following but it seems not to work properly. private bool IsLastSegment(SubmitSm s...
- Mon Oct 11, 2021 6:47 am
- Forum: Inetlab.SMPP v2.x (.NET Standard, .NET Core)
- Topic: Concatenated in SMPP Server Load Balancing with multiple binds.
- Replies: 2
- Views: 51969
Concatenated in SMPP Server Load Balancing with multiple binds.
Hi, We have set up a load balancing SMPP server using nginx with least_conn method. Currently, we have observed an issue of concatenation once our client using multiple binds to send. We have deployed 3 nodes for SMPP servers. Once the client establishes the connection, it's bind to different server...
- Fri Sep 10, 2021 7:37 am
- Forum: Inetlab.SMPP v2.x (.NET Standard, .NET Core)
- Topic: Smpp Client load balancing deployment
- Replies: 1
- Views: 41016
Smpp Client load balancing deployment
Hi, I am being confused about making the load balancing for our SMPP clients. I have created a project that could handle multiple providers connections and the number of bindings limit according to the requirements but I am stuck at the step to create the load balancing once we would like to increas...
- Wed Sep 08, 2021 4:03 am
- Forum: Inetlab.SMPP v2.x (.NET Standard, .NET Core)
- Topic: Multiple Smpp client classes
- Replies: 2
- Views: 51724
Re: Multiple Smpp client classes
Hi,
Thank you for your help.
Thank you for your help.
- Tue Sep 07, 2021 4:31 am
- Forum: Inetlab.SMPP v2.x (.NET Standard, .NET Core)
- Topic: Multiple Smpp client classes
- Replies: 2
- Views: 51724
Multiple Smpp client classes
Hi, I am seeking the best setup for the problem as following. We have many providers and each of them gives us the specified TPS. What is the best way if I create multiple classes (each class represents the provider with the specified configuration) or create multiple sources (each source represents...
- Wed May 05, 2021 5:33 am
- Forum: Inetlab.SMPP v2.x (.NET Standard, .NET Core)
- Topic: Multiple Connectivity To Servers
- Replies: 5
- Views: 54403
Re: Multiple Connectivity To Servers
Hi, your vendor would have provided multiple IP address as one would be primary & the other secondary to be used in case you are not able to connect to the first one. Otherwise I assume it will not be logical to connect with one Client to multiple IP's. They told me that we could connect to any of ...
- Wed May 05, 2021 5:05 am
- Forum: Inetlab.SMPP v2.x (.NET Standard, .NET Core)
- Topic: Multiple Connectivity To Servers
- Replies: 5
- Views: 54403
Re: Multiple Connectivity To Servers
Hi alt, As they shared, I can establish the connection to all of this IP over all types of binding (TRX, TX, RX). Example: Provided IP hosts: host_A, host_B, host_C ( TRX binding is supported on each host) My IP host: srcHost_A The answer is how can I connect to three hosts above on a single SMPP cl...
- Fri Apr 23, 2021 9:25 am
- Forum: Inetlab.SMPP v2.x (.NET Standard, .NET Core)
- Topic: Multiple Connectivity To Servers
- Replies: 5
- Views: 54403
Multiple Connectivity To Servers
Hi,
Our vendor gave us two IPs for establishing the connectivity.
Is it possible to connect and bind to both of them on a single SMPP client?
Our vendor gave us two IPs for establishing the connectivity.
Is it possible to connect and bind to both of them on a single SMPP client?
- Tue Apr 20, 2021 9:33 am
- Forum: Inetlab.SMPP v1.1 & v1.2
- Topic: Migration to new license
- Replies: 1
- Views: 42086
Migration to new license
Hi, As the release notes of version 2.8.4, it's required the new license file that must have contain the product name. I need to upgrade our product because it's now running on the old version. Is there any issue if I generate the new license? Is the old product still running on the previous license...